Tuesday, May 29, 2018

Disney Princesses As: Career Women!

May, 2018: We're still re-imagining Disney Princesses in inventive ways. #somethingsneverchange

The latest one imagines Disney Princesses as modern-day career women:

via ScaryMommy
The collection is by Matt Burt and he's put a lot of thought into the careers for each character.

Chronologically, here they are:

Snow White -- Leading Psychologist
Cinderella -- Animal Rights Activist
Aurora -- CEO of Spinning Wheel Coffee 
Ariel -- Pop Star & Record Producer 
Belle -- University Chancellor
Jasmine -- UN Ambassador
Pocahontas -- Environmental Activist (I mean, duh)
Mulan -- Title IX Lawyer
Tiana -- Award Winning Chef (I mean, duh)
Rapunzel -- Neurologist
Merida -- Two Time Olympian (Archery & Equestrian)
Elsa & Anna* -- Climate Change Scientists
Moana -- Officer in the Navy

*Not official princesses, but, a common mistake.

Okay, one, it's clear that Burt put a lot of thought and rationale into each of these career choices.
Two--I love that each of them is an empowering career for the character -- you've got chancellors and ambassadors and scientists. (Yay for Women in STEM!)

But.

I wouldn't be me if I didn't have nit-picky thoughts.

1. Most obvious -- Tiana & Pocahontas: really, any other career options for these two wouldn't work.


2. My favorite "new career" -- Aurora: I love that she's the CEO of a coffee company. Tongue-in-cheek, but oddly appropriate.


3. No...just no -- Snow White as a "Leading Psychologist" and Rapunzel as a "Neurologist": Nope. Not buying it. While I appreciate that Burt made Snow a "leading" psychologist who cares for her clients but also presents at conferences, I...would not put my faith in her as a psychologist. If anything, I think she'd made a great preschool/kindergarten/elementary school teacher. Her cheerful disposition plus her ability to make people actually wash their hands? Textbook.
And Rapunzel? Yeah, cool. Neurologist, doctor, med school, blah blah blah. But the thing I love about the end of Tangled is that Flynn tells us that she learned to rule and govern her people and was a great princess/queen. So, yeah. I would have liked to see her be a senator or even a female president. 

    

4. Miscellaneous thoughts, from someone who has clearly spent too much time thinking about this:
  • I guess I see Cinderella as an Animal Rights Activist -- but maybe she and Ariel join forces together. I don't love Ariel as a Pop Star -- because she's my favorite, and it seems a shallow career -- but...I suppose Ariel is kind of shallow, so it fits. :/ 
  • Again, I love that Belle is the chancellor of a university, but again, it kinda doesn't fit her personality. I don't see her as an authoritative decision-maker -- something I think Once Upon A Time captures nicely with Belle as a librarian -- maybe an English professor at best. 
  • Mulan & Moana -- For some reason, I'm just "meh" about these. I think it's because they seem too rebellious for such straight-laced careers. I'm pretty sure Mulan would do something -- with the best of intentions, of course -- that would end up getting her disbarred. And Moana? She relies too much on emotion and instinct to be a good naval officer -- I can't see her taking orders well. 
Like I said, I've clearly spent too much time thinking about this! 




Monday, May 21, 2018

A Real Life Fairy Tale

As an unabashed Anglophile, I've always been "meh" about the modern Royal Family. (I prefer the underrated soap-opera-y goodness of E!'s The Royals. Like, I know it's trashy and ridiculous, but there's something comforting about it -- and it's kind of fun to imagine what goes on behind the closed doors of royal palaces. Us Weekly -- or one of them -- shows that celebrities are just like us, but are royals? I'd like to think so, but sometimes it's hard to imagine. Although articles like this make it a little easier -- Huffpost's "Experts Dissect Meghan Markle’s Mother’s Body Language With The Royal Family." Although it's weird to think of Charles -- arguably the villain in Diana's narrative -- as "the nice guy.")

But I digress.

The point is, I didn't wake up early to watch The Royal Wedding. I didn't have any plans to, despite thinking that Harry & Meghan make a more relatable couple than William and Kate ever did. But that's a can of worms for another day. But then my husband had the coverage on, and I was curious what kind of dress Meghan Markle was wearing as well as what celebrities were invited/attending. (Sidebar: I love that the cast of Suits were invited...to the ceremony at least. I don't know why, but it makes me happy. I see it as genuine affection.)

But I digress again. The point is, I got sucked into the coverage and as I was watching the highlights, two things struck me. One, how modern, American, and black the ceremony was (for a royal wedding) and two, how Meghan Markle was basically Cinderella -- in appearance, not necessarily her life story, proud feminist that she is. When I saw her walking down the stairs, Disney fan that I am, this is what I thought of:

via Cosmo

And, thankfully, I'm not alone. Check out this article from Cosmo, and this tweet: 


Aaaand now back to our regularly scheduled programming.

Sunday, May 13, 2018

Newsies on Netflix!!!

THIS IS NOT A DRILL:


I logged into my Netflix account the other day and was browsing the New Releases. I was looking for Thor: Ragnarok (it wasn't there, womp womp) and, instead, I found this.

Apparently, you can watch a taped broadcast of Newsies -- with, I think, the original cast.

My reaction:



I love, love, LOVE Newsies. The first time I watched it was in freshman year of high school, in ELP (lawd, I don't even remember what that acronym stands for...Economics, Legal, and Politics? Something like that?). We also watched Dave, which is a delightful (if not dated) movie, so clearly my ELP teacher's movie game was on point.

But I loved Newsies -- before I even knew it was Disney movie or that Christian Bale was in it. The music was infectious (of course, it's Alan Menken), it was informational but entertaining, and sure, it ran a little long, but it was just...fun.

So when they made a musical and, arguably, improved it -- yay girl power! -- I was there for it. I never made it to NYC to see the original cast, but bought tickets when the tour came to DPAC. And now I can watch it whenever I want.

And, can I just say? If this is what we can expect from Disney's new streaming service...


Take my money now, Disney.

Wednesday, May 9, 2018

Disney Princess Toms

Today, my first pairs of Toms arrived in the mail. I know they've been popular for awhile, and people swear they're super comfy, but...I'm always a little reluctant to join the bandwagon. But these had strawberries and oranges and carrots on them -- and they just seemed so summery.

Plus, I wanted to see if their sizing was accurate (it is) since I came across this news the other day:


I blogged about them a while ago -- and the big news was that they'd be featuring rarely seen concept art from the Disney Archives. 

Now we've got some close ups of the art -- and I have to say, the Snow White ones are my favorite, which is a surprise to me.

The Cinderella ones are actually pretty cool -- I have a friend who is probably eyeing the ones with the mice, since Gus is her favorite character -- and I really like the concept art of Cinderella's mom's dress that the mice fix for her. There's also a nice simplicity to the Glass Slipper ones, but I'm not sure they'll warrant the (inflated) price tag.


The Sleeping Beauty ones were the ones I was actually most excited for. Not because of Aurora (because let's face it -- the movie's named after her, but she's not the protagonist) but because of the Good Fairies, particularly Merrywether, who's always been a favorite of mine. But...meh.


On the plus side, at least Aurora's wearing the blue dress. The prevalence of her in the pink dress in the merchandise seriously annoys me. (I get that when Disney made Cinderella's dress blue instead of silver, they decided they couldn't have two princesses in blue dresses, but still.)

But the Snow White ones? I really like them! 


Maybe because she's the OG princess, or maybe because they're blue, but these are my favorite. Aaaand I'll probably be ordering a pair when they start selling them. 

And a Little Mermaid pair? I'll take those next please, Disney. 

Friday, May 4, 2018

I Cannot Even With This Mulan Mess RN

A few weeks ago, I went to the outlet malls with my mom. [This was before Toys R Us announced they were closing all of their stores. Legit closing -- not like those "Going Out FOR Business" sales you see at all those stores in the beach.] We popped into the Toys R Us outlet to look for Easter basket gifts and, of course, we ended up in the Disney section. 

Where I stumbled upon this:


Like...I don't even know what to do with this.

  1. How old are they supposed to be? I get the Animator Dolls series -- especially when there's an actual younger version of the character in the film. But these? They look younger -- not like their counterparts in the film -- but at the same time, they still look adult? It's weird.
  2. They don't even look like themselves -- Mulan looks like a weird version of that Dolls of the World Thai Barbie doll. And IDK what's going on with Shang. 
  3. Don't even get me started on that slogan: "Princess Mulan brings great honor to her family." PRINCESS Mulan? I know she's part of the Disney Princess brand/franchise, but I've never heard her referred to as Princess Mulan. And where did her crown come from?!?
    And how exactly is she bringing great honor to her family? Not as a warrior, in that outfit. That pink thing, coupled with the fact that she's paired with Shang, would seem to imply that, after everything that happens in the movie, the way she brings honor to her family is through her marriage. 
You know I normally support/defend you Disney, but your merchandising people missed the mark on this one. 


Monday, April 30, 2018

Let's Talk About This Live-Action Mulan

*sigh*

Here we go again.

A few weeks ago, I read about the casting news for the new live-action adaptation of Mulan:


via Variety

At first, I was just excited to discuss the news with my students -- for three reasons:

  1. Jet Li is being cast as the Emperor -- given Li's martial arts & action movie background, it seems an interesting choice for the Emperor (who is a very zen character in the animated film). I could be biased though -- Pat Morita is the Emperor for me -- I imagine this is how some Harry Potter fans felt when Richard Harris died and Michael Gambon replaced him as Dumbledore. 
  2. Gong Li is "the villain as a powerful witch" -- WHOA. This is what I was most excited to talk about -- there's no witch in the animated film and the implications of this are fascinating. Not only are we seemingly getting rid of the Huns/Shan Yu, but we're adding in a female villain. And not only a female villain -- a witch. More female-female conflict? And what are the ramifications for the empowerment storyline? (i.e., the fact that Mulan was so awesome because she beat all the boys and proved she was just as good -- if not better -- than them.)
  3. Fun tidbit: Mulan gets a sister.
    Interesting on several levels because (1) Mulan was one of the only Disney Princess films to show an intact nuclear family -- Dad + Mom + Mulan + Grandma. Up to this point, only Aurora had both her parents alive -- but I don't really count that since her mother is so underdeveloped it's painful and has maybe one line of dialogue in the entire film. So, yes, while Mulan's relationship with her father is still the central relationship of the film (like all of the other 2nd wave princess films) and while her mother is a relatively flat character, it's still important.
    And (2) Mulan doesn't have any other siblings in the animated film -- least of all male siblings who could have ostensibly taken her father's place instead of the daughter. But more importantly, Disney Princesses don't usually get female friends or siblings. Sure, Ariel has her sisters, but she's the "different one" (with her red hair and her mismatched shells and tail) and doesn't seem particularly close with any of them. Sure, Pocahontas has Nakoma -- but that friendship has disastrous results. It's not until we get to Tiana that we have a princess with a "good" friend -- and whatever you say about Lottie, she is a good friend -- and it's not until Elsa and Anna that we see a developed sisterly relationship with depth. So while we don't know anything about their relationship, it's at least another step in the right direction.
    Although, as some of my Chinese students pointed out, Mulan does have siblings in the original ballad. 
But the discussion turned into something more than I could have hoped for. My students had questions -- really good questions. They wanted to know more about who was playing Mulan, about this witch, about Shang, and about the release date. 

Which led me to this Elle article: "Everything We Know About Disney's Live-Action Mulan" -- where we zeroed in on this:


Wait--there's a character replacing Shang? As in, THERE WILL BE NO LI SHANG IN THIS MOVIE?!




Obviously, this was worth investigating. So, we clicked the link, which led us to this Tweet:


Let's break this down. First up, this not-Shang Chen guy:


"Full of himself, with a mean, bullying streak to him" -- we quickly drew parallels to Gaston (possibly because we'd just watched that live-action film for discussion), which does not bode well, given the type of toxic masculinity Gaston represents.

While we were also confused by the phrase "something like love" (what does that even mean?!?!), the more problematic part is the part where "after learning that his rival is a woman, his intense feelings of rivalry turn into something very different." On the one hand, it seems as if this is Disney's answer to any sort of queer subtext that might have existed in the animated film -- Shang may or may not have had some sort of attraction to Ping, which made him sort of a bisexual icon. (People were not happy.) And, on the other hand, all of this smacks of that silly thing parents used to say "if a boy is mean to you, it means he likes you." I don't know -- I find it extremely problematic that when Honghui thinks Mulan is a boy, he's a rival who he can/should bully; but as soon as he finds out Mulan is a girl, BAM! He's in love.

But in case you thought that was the worst, it gets better:

So, on the positive side, one of my students pointed out that while the casting call for Chen Honghui mentions his attraction to her, at least there's no mention of Mulan's romantic feelings for the men in her life, so...silver lining?

But here are the interesting things:
  • The Huns are out. (Which means, at the very least, that if this isn't a musical, we'll have to change the iconic line, "Let's get down to business / to defeat the Huns.") I have no idea who the Gokturks are, and the Wikipedia entry isn't super helpful.
  • My students focused on the "strapping down her breasts" line as an odd thing to mention specifically. I mean, yes, one would assume that dressing as a man who necessitate that, but it's an odd thing to mention in a casting call. Unless they were specifically looking for a busty, female female -- as in, one who was clearly female. 
  • But the most interesting -- and potentially problematic -- part is this: "There is a mysterious power inside Mulan." 

  • At first, I thought it was just the dramatic language of a casting call (you know, like "something like love"). But the more we talked about it -- and especially in conjunction with the revelation of the addition of a WITCH -- the more it seemed plausible that this "mysterious power" could actually be supernatural in nature. 
Just to be clear:

Apparently, this news -- the casting calls -- aren't really news, as this article from March of 2017 makes clear. Donya Abramo also makes clear the significance of this information, in a very eloquent way:


I don't remember this information going viral a year ago, but with the explicit addition of a supernatural character, the theory is gaining traction. As is the outrage that the fundamental message of the story could potentially be changed. As Abramo points out, "The beauty of Mulan is in the indisputable truth that what she achieves is down to her own skill and stubborn determination — both mental and physical." In other words, Mulan was a revolutionary character not only for her representation -- don't delve too deeply into Disney's past representation of Asian characters; it isn't pretty -- but for her deviation from past Disney princesses. She wasn't passive or focused on romance -- she was every bit as strong, resilient, intelligent as the boys, and, in the end, was the one to save China and the Emperor. Her story -- however much it deviated from the original Chinese ballad -- was empowering and inspiring. 

But if you give her powers? If you make her supernatural? I suppose it doesn't necessarily take away from her individual uniqueness, but it turns the story into another Chosen One narrative. She becomes another Harry Potter, specially chosen to defeat the supernatural evil. 

Yes, at this point, most of this is just speculation, since we're going on rumors and casting calls, not concrete facts. And, yes. Scripts undergo rewrites and films undergo reshoots, so it's all fluid and up-in-the-air right now. 

But still.

The rumors paint a very troubling picture -- not in the least because, up to this point, Disney's live action adaptations have been extremely faithful to their source material. Some critics question why even remake the film if you're just going to essentially remake the movie, but with actors not animation. Which begs the question -- why start deviating now? In the case of a film like Dumbo, the answer is kind of obvious: there's not a terrible amount of substance to the original, so, yeah. You're going to have to create a story there. 

But that's not the case with Mulan. 

Maybe they were trying to be more faithful to the original source material? Or, as Yohana Desta points out in her Vanity Fair piece, "casting a Chinese star helps the studio cater directly to Chinese audiences, the all-important demographic that can bolster or destroy blockbuster's global box-office hopes." But, as my Chinese students angrily and frustratedly pointed out, there's no magic in the original ballad -- and, to them, changing the story so significantly was not likely to curry favor with them. 

So, I guess we'll wait and see. But I do not have high hopes. 

Tim Burton's Live-Action Dumbo

Y'all know I've had my reservations about Disney's live action adaptations of it's classic films *coughAladdincough* And I've got a whole host of thoughts about this new Mulan information.

But today's focus is Dumbo. Yep. Dumbo.




Like, I don't even know what to do with this.
To be fair, I was skeptical about The Jungle Book -- and I was pretty impressed.
To be fair, I was skeptical about  The Lion King -- despite the stellar cast -- and I still am.
To be fair, I'm not a big Tim Burton fan.
To be fair, circuses have always kinda creeped me out, and the "Pink Elephants" sequence from the original animated film still gives me the heebie-jeebies.

So...yeah. Skeptical about sums it up. And these pictures don't really help.