Friday, September 30, 2016

Disney Princesses As....Hogwarts Students

This week in "Disney Princesses As...": they're Hogwarts students! Or, at the very least, they've been sorted into Hogwarts Houses.

While this warms my nerdy heart, it isn't exactly something new....Disney Princess Reimaginer Extraordinaire Isaiah Stevens has done it, and so has a Deviant Artist named Annabella (hers might be my favorite).

My point is: it's been done before, so why do it again unless you disagree with the Sorting Results? And there are definitely some different results here.

Some of them make total sense (a.k.a. I totally agree with them). Like, for instance:

PC: Disney via HelloGiggles

This makes total sense: Snow White and Cinderella with their unrelenting optimism and kindness? Total Hufflepuff. And they are clearly unafraid of toil (as all good Hufflepuffs are) because they not only clean for the baddies in their lives, but they do it with a smile and a song.

Also making total sense?

PC: Disney via HelloGiggles
Yah. Mulan and Merida are both clearly Gryffindors. I mean...the name of Merida's movie is Brave, so I totally get that one.

Also one I like, but hadn't really thought of before:

PC: Disney via HelloGiggles
Ariel is totally the Luna Lovegood of Disney Princesses. And, she's my favorite princess, so it makes sense I'd love that she's sorted into my house.

Speaking of my favorites....
PC: Disney via HelloGiggles

I'm sorry. Elsa is NOT a Slytherin. No. Just no. She is 100% a Ravenclaw. I'm not sure how being "grounded in reality" disqualifies you from being a Ravenclaw -- not all Ravenclaws are like Luna. (Cho Chang was a Ravenclaw, after all. Not that that really helps my case.) The thing that bugs me here is that Elsa is NOT ambitious -- a very Slytherin quality, and not necessarily in a negative way. But "an ambitious leader" wouldn't retreat from a position to power to a place of solitude as Elsa does: a Slytherin would not go build and rule an ice power in isolation. A Slytherin would most definitely stay and rule, regardless of how people thought of him/her. 

Hans, for example, is absolutely a Slytherin -- but he's not a princess. Which I think is the flaw here: Disney princesses are all inherently good; not too many of them are going to belong in Slytherin, even if you read the Slytherin qualities positively. There's going to be a lot of Hufflepuff (First Wave) and a lot of Gryffindor. 

But, if you just look at the princesses, somebody's got to be in Slytherin. Which is why this happens:

PC: Disney via HelloGiggles

Again, I say: NO. JUST NO. I get the ambition part -- which is why I see Slytherin, but Tiana ultimately gives up her dream of a restaurant when Facilier offers it to her: she chooses love/Naveen over the restaurant, which again, I'm not sure a Slytherin would do. (Hence why she's a Disney princess.) But more than that -- Tiana's defined by her work ethic -- she is as unafraid of toil as Snow White and Cinderella are, probably even more so. (I've argued that Tiana is basically an updated version of Cinderella; very similar rags-to-riches story, just with more modern complexity.) The Sorting Hat tells us that "Those patient Hufflepuffs are true / And unafraid of toil." Yeah. Tiana saved for her restaurant penny by penny for years: that is textbook Hufflepuff, right there.

I know I take this all way too seriously, but Disney and Harry Potter are two of my favorite things so I love when they collide. 

Wednesday, September 28, 2016

Dear God: Disney Is Making A Live-Action Lion King

I suppose we only have ourselves to blame for this one: according to Variety, this summer's live-action (re: CGI) adaptation of The Jungle Book earned over $900 million worldwide (the third Disney film to do so this year; I imagine that Moana will be the fourth in November).

So I guess Disney likes Jon Favreau because...



That's right. Not only is Disney making a live-action (re: CGI because there's not even a single human in this story) The Lion King -- but they've put it on the fast-track. Whatever that means.

I kinda get The Jungle Book adaptation...it was the 1960s and isn't as popular but remaking the Renaissance Disney classics? WHY?!

Disney, I love you. I really, truly, honestly do. But at some point, the remakes have to stop. NOTHING will ever touch Elton John's version of "The Circle of Life" so...just stop.

From Engagement Session To Empowered Princess Photoshoot

This has got to be one of my favorite Disney-related stories EVER.

Cliff Notes Version: After ending her engagement with her fiancé, Brooke Lowry decided not to cancel her engagement photoshoot at Disneyland, and chose to do a solo shoot instead.

Brooke Lowry, you are my hero. I have a feeling we'd be pretty good friends. 
[No, really: if you want to talk to someone about getting a Master's Degree in Children's Literature, I am happy to talk with you about it! I highly recommend it. Oxford is my favorite place in the world, but London is a super close second.]

Longer details: According to HuffPost, "Lowry, a former Disney Television Animation employee says she has loved watching Disney redefine what it means to be a “Disney Princess” while staying true to the classics. “These remarkable female characters are put in extreme circumstances, but still display qualities that we all have- strength, beauty, compassion, and courage.” This was the perfect opportunity to practice what she preaches even when it wasn’t easy."

PC: DPark Photography via HuffPost

What I love the most about this story is the positive interpretation that Lowry has on the Disney Princesses. I know she worked for Disney, but that's not always a guarantee of a positive experience. According to Buzzfeed:

“These women are kind even when others are not,” she said. “They are loyal and compassionate, inclusive and accepting, elegant and discerning, dreamers and doers. They look for the best in others, they bring honor to their families, and they work hard and stay true to themselves.”

Another quality she said she admired was the ability to be “positive amongst tragedy.” She decided to emulate these qualities and view the shoot as a new beginning.

So, instead of being the cutesy couple out for a Disneyland date, it became the ‘I am a Princess, long may I reign’ shoot,” she said. “Having Disneyland itself as the backdrop was symbolic, too — a place for me to begin a new dream and imagine a new narrative for myself.”

Thi is exactly the kind of narrative I wish circulated more about the Disney Princesses. Too often the focus is that they promote unhealthy images and unrealistic expectations -- and that is certainly true, to an extent -- but there's so much more to those stories. Who are we to judge and specify what someone takes away from a film? This is also a big part of the "Dream Big, Princess" campaign, 

PC: DPark Photography via Buzzfeed
And, if you need even more of a reason to love/be jealous of this, here's what Lowry told HuffPost of her experience at Disneyland during the shoot:
“I was feeling vulnerable and self conscious of course that morning, but everyone was so, so kind. My hair and makeup artist Tatiana gifted me her services, a precious Disney employee named Pearl “Jay” Wang heard me talking to the photographer and escorted me on a private tour of the Royal Hall, the princesses inside treated me so gently, I got into the park for free, I had a few guests ask me which princess I was, which made my day, and my photographer Drexelle Parkwas absolutely amazing in every way and made me feel like royalty. It honestly couldn’t have been a more beautiful experience, and I was filled with the peace and comfort that only comes from above. I’m so glad I decided to go through with the photos, and more importantly I’m so grateful for the smallest acts of daily kindness that make all the difference in a broken world."
Never underestimate the power of Disney Customer Service -- they have the capability to go above and beyond for you, and when they do, it can make any experience magical.

PC: DPark Photography via HuffPost
The only thing that irks me about this story is the fact that "photo shoots at Disney" are an absolutely legitimate thing. As in, you can hire a professional photographer and have a photo shoot at Disneyland. Which...cool. But you can't do this at Magic Kingdom in Disney World.

Disney: please explain WHY to me. Why is Disneyland okay, but Magic Kingdom is not?!





Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Angela Lansbury Wows With Surprise Performance of "Beauty and the Beast"

I first came across this story on The Mary Sue, and their commentary pretty much sums it up:

"I don’t know if you’re aware but Star Trek isn’t the only pop culture phenomenon celebrating a major milestone. This year marks the 25thanniversary of the Disney animated classic, Beauty and the Beast, which means it’s time to freak out because that was a while ago and you’re super old now. Kidding."
Either way, Angela Lansbury is 90 years old. That's a healthy dose of perspective, right there. I hope I can still walk as well as she does at 90, let alone sing that well. (I can't even sing that well now.)


Monday, September 19, 2016

Moana Halloween Costume Controversy: Cultural Appropriation or Cosplay?

Yesterday, I read an article on io9 about a new Disney Halloween costume from the upcoming Moana:

PC @ io9
Basically, kids can dress-up like The Rock's character, Maui, from the film:

PC @ DisneyStore Online

The costume allows the wearer to don the "signature tattoos" as well as the rope necklace and the island-style skirt.

The controversy, however, comes from the fact that the "skin" of the costume is brown, leading many (but not all!) online to descry the costume as "cultural appropriation" and allowing children to blatantly practice brownface. The Buzzfeed article, "People Are Angry About This Disney Costume," captures some of the Twitter reactions.)

Before I go any further, let me make this clear:
I do not condone brownface or blackface or cultural appropriation. 

We good? 

Okay.

What I'm interested in is the line between cultural appropriation and, say, something like cosplay. or even the fact that we live in a melting pot of cultures and the blurring of cultural lines is going to happen. And, as Jenni Avins put it in a piece for The Atlantic, "No matter how much I love cable-knit sweaters and Gruyere cheese, I don’t want to live in a world where the only cultural inspiration I’m entitled to comes from my roots in Ireland, Switzerland, and Eastern Europe.

I'd like to think that I'm not the only one to struggle with this question--and I'd also like to think that my struggle, at the very least, means that I'm not blind to the issue and am aware that it exists. 

But when something like this Moana costume incident happens, I don't quite know what to think. My knee-jerk reaction is to say, "It's just a kid's costume," but I realize that that knee-jerk reaction is part of the problem.

Also part of the problem: the fact that the film hasn't been released yet, and therefore, I don't know how Moana portrays Polynesian culture. 

The way I understand it, from Nadra Kareem Nittle's helpful article, "cultural appropriation" happens when there's the "unauthorized use of another culture's dance, dress, music, language, folklore, cuisine, traditional medicine, religious symbols, etc." -- and usually involves a dominant culture exploiting a minority culture. Nittle identifies cultural appropriation as problematic because it (1) "robs minority groups of the credit they deserve" (due to association with the majority group) and (2) reinforces stereotypes about the minority groups. Nittle also points out that cultural appropriation is particularly egregious around Halloween, when people don stereotyped costumes without knowing the "roots of such dress and the challenges those who originated it have faced in Western society."

The last part is particularly troubling about the Maui costume. 

A quick Google search reveals more information on what the Buzzfeed article touches on at the end: that while Disney is being praised for it's diversity with Moana as well as for it's progressive portrayal of a female action hero (no love story!), people still believe that Disney is being offensive and racist by reinforcing stereotypes of obese Samoans. (See also: this article from The Washington Post.)

My first thought was that his size was to help portray him as a demi-god -- as larger than life. That being said, I fully realize that I'm saying this from a position of relative privilege as a white woman and not as a member of the culture being stereotyped. If the people from the Polynesian/Pacific Islander culture think it's offensive, end-stop. 

So obviously the accusations of Disney using another culture's dress/folklore with authorization have some merit but again, the issue of the Halloween costumes makes me think -- especially the issue of kids' costumes. 

I'm not sure what the right answer is -- or if there even is a right answer. But here are some of the things marinating in my mind:
  • If the costume is offensive, is there an alternative? 
  • What if Disney didn't have a Maui costume? Would they get accusations of being racist for not offering a Halloween costume for a minority character while you can buy costumes for Snow White and Cinderella? 
  • The brown skin sleeves of the costume are a vehicle for the tattoos -- is the answer to offer the costume in different sleeve colors (e.g. a Maui with white sleeves, black sleeves, etc.)?
  • Would a "white Maui" costume then be subject to accusations of white-washing? 
  • Could they have made the costume sleeves "sheer" so that a child's natural skin color showed?
  • I have to believe that if a child wants to dress up as Maui or Moana for Halloween, it's because they like the character right and want to emulate him/her? And not because they want to appropriate a culture? But is that how cultural appropriation starts? 
  • When we see little girls dressed as their favorite princess at Disney World, do we call it cultural appropriation? 
  • What if my daughter wants to dress up as Jasmine or Tiana because they're her favorite princess? What do I do then? (I'm assuming we can't have a super detailed conversation about cultural appropriation at three years old, although I have no doubt I will be more "academic" about the Disney films than most parents....)
  • How is cultural appropriation different from cosplay (which is defined as "the art or practice of wearing costumes to portray characters from fiction, especially from manga, animation, and science fiction")?
  • Does the "fiction" qualification excuse cultural appropriation? Surely not. After all, fiction and culture are intimately connected so...if an American cosplays as a character from Japanese anime, is it cultural appropriation? 
I would honestly love some insight on this topic: what if my daughter, exposed as she will be to the full canon of Disney movies, wants to wear a Tiana dress when we go to Disney World? Or a Jasmine outfit? (Assuming, of course, that my daughter is one who likes princesses and wearing dresses...I didn't when I was 4.) What's the right way to handle that situation?

Thursday, September 8, 2016

Disney = Universal

This afternoon, my mom sent me this via text:


Okay. It's a Frozen merchandise display. No big deal, right?

Well, maybe.

Except for the fun fact that this photo was taken at a store in SWITZERLAND. 
(Going to Switzerland has always been on my dad's bucket list, so, since it's his 60th this year, my parents are on a 2-week vacation (excluding travel days) there. And, after seeing their photos, I really want to go now.) 

BUT. The point is--Disney. Is. Everywhere. 

Now, I have no idea how well this merchandise is selling -- that is, I have no idea if the Swiss really do love Frozen or if Disney just has a phenomenal international team. It might be both. 

Wednesday, September 7, 2016

New Outfits For Aladdin & Jasmine (But Mostly For Jasmine)

Oh, Internet Rage Machine -- I can always count on you to get overly emotional about something relatively trivial.

Today's Rage Fest is brought to you by changes to Jasmine and Aladdin's outfits at EPCOT (but mainly Jasmine's outfit).



On the left-hand side, you have the "old" outfit -- the one that looks like the one the animated cartoon Jasmine wears in the movie. On the right-hand side, you have Jasmine's "new winter outfit" -- although perhaps it ought to be called "Jasmine's new modest outfit to keep men people from being pervy and gross."

And people hate it (click the pic to enlarge):

Let's break this down.

To start with, the Disney Princesses (and most characters at the parks) undergo a wardrobe change for Fall and Winter. While I refuse to believe that the dresses they wear during the spring and summer are lightweight, breathable, and cool -- or that Orlando gets cool enough during the winter/spring months to warrant a fake-fur-lined cloak -- sure. Princesses dress with the seasons. It usually loves longer sleeves (if the gowns were short-sleeved, arm sleeves are added), gloves, capes, and some sort of (fake) fur decoration -- to indicate the chilly weather, I suppose. (For some additional photos, visit this blog post.)

PC: Unknown. Found via Pinterest.

What's especially interesting is that Jasmine already had a winter costume -- a fairly amorphous (and comparatively bland) cape-coat:

PC: Kenny The Pirate
Don't get me wrong: it's a beautiful costume, but compared to some of the elaborate gowns the other princesses wear, it's kinda shapeless.

Maybe that's because, sometimes, being a Disney Princess isn't all happy thoughts and pixie dust. There have been a lot of rumors/former employee stories about creepy dads hitting on the princesses, scantily-clad or not. (Which...eww.)

So, FWIW, I love Jasmine's new outfit -- I think it's gorgeous and feminine and sure, it doesn't like the "old" one. But why should it? And, if it means even one less creepy comment, then of course it's worth it.

Thursday, September 1, 2016

New Sneak Peek of Beauty and the Beast!

This video started circulating on social media yesterday -- basically, a teaser trailer for a "Sneak Peek" at the live action Beauty and the Beast that's on the special 25th Anniversary Platinum Edition. (Which is the fancy Disney marketing way of getting/trying to get you to buy a DVD you probably already own.)

The clip is, obviously, a teaser for the full video, but you still get a glimpse of Emma Waston as Belle at a table read -- and also Dan Stevens' Beast (complete with grumbly, growly voice!). The scene is, I think, Belle and Beast in the library, poring over a book -- and seems to come from the Broadway musical rather than the film. (In the musical, during "Something There," Belle finds the book and tries to get Beast to read it, at which point he confesses that he can't read, and they begin to bond/fall in love over the book/reading lessons.)

All that to say: if they're deviating, however slightly, from the animated film, I hope that they correct some of the not-so-great aspects of the film. Like, I hope the Beast is maybe emo and not bordering-on-abusive angry. *fingerscrossed*


Also--Disney, I see how you're purposefully withholding images of Emma Watson as Belle since you know that's what we want.

I hope there's a trailer with Moana. Like, a real, full-length trailer.