Showing posts with label mulan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mulan. Show all posts

Friday, August 28, 2020

Kelly Marie Tran To Voice Raya in _Raya and the Last Dragon_

 

Woke up to this news this morning:

Star Wars star Kelly Marie Tran is voicing the main character in Disney’s newest animated film, “Raya and the Last Dragon”

Posted by Variety on Thursday, August 27, 2020


 And honestly? I am here for it. 👏 👏 👏

While I'm not the biggest Star Wars fan, I did really enjoy Tran's role in Rian Johnson's Episode VIII; to see her "more than sidelined," to use Julia Alexander's words, in Episode IX, was more than disappointing. 

But what's interesting to me is that this film, despite the plot summary, is being billed (and marketed, I'm sure) as a princess film

Let's take a look at the plot summary from IMDB: 

"In a realm known as Lumandra, a re-imagined Earth inhabited by an ancient civilization, a warrior named Raya is determined to find the last dragon." 

And from Wikipedia:

  "A lone warrior sets out to find the last dragon in existence and save the kingdom of Kumandra from the villainous Drunn." 

With the exception of Mulan, and *maybe* Moana, Disney movies don't usually focus on warriors. That is, typically, Disney Animations studios films skew female-centric, with the Disney Princess, Disney Fairies and Frozen franchises anchoring the studio. Pixar, on the other hand, skews predominantly male. While there are exceptions to both of course (e.g., The Lion King for Disney; Brave and Inside Out for Pixar), the generalizations hold true. 

And, for better or for worse (and people love to point out the "worse"), Disney princess movies are a staple of American childhood and culture. So it's interesting to me that Raya and the Last Dragon is being billed as a princess movie. 

Look at this post from The Mary Sue, for example: 


Get money!

Posted by The Mary Sue on Thursday, August 27, 2020

This movie, then, has the potential to be groundbreaking for Disney. Awkwafina, who will co-start with Tran, has already praised the movie's "sisterhood":


 


Two things to note:
(1) the clip features Cassie Steele, a British-Filipino actress who was originally cast in the role -- wonder what happened there? and

(2) sisterhood, on the heels of Frozen, is nothing new for Disney. It's worth pointing out that of 14 (un)official princesses -- only four of them have biological siblings (Ariel, Merida, and Anna & Elsa)  and only three of them have sisters (Merida has brothers). The only film where sisterhood features a significant role is, of course, Frozen, as Ariel's sisters are largely irrelevant to the plot. And even in Frozen, Anna was intended to be the lead, with Elsa originally slated for the villain role. Jennifer Lee, thankfully, updated that narrative, and we have the two empowered characters we know and love today. 

And while I don't think that Raya and Sisu are biological sisters (plot twist?!), this might actually be *more* important -- because Disney Princesses don't really get "friends." Sure, they get animal sidekicks and they may even get magical helpers, but not *real* friends. The only two princesses who have female friends are Pocahontas (Nakoma) and Tiana (Charlotte) and I would argue that only Tiana and Charlotte are *real* friends (Nakoma is largely a plot device), however historically unlikely their friendship would be. 

So if this film deliberately features two female leads (as opposed to an accidental female lead with Elsa), who aren't biologically related, and focuses on their friendship/dynamic and both of them are Asian women? Like I said -- groundbreaking. 

But here's where it gets a bit tricky for me...in an interview with Entertainment Weekly, Kelly Marie Tran revealed, 

"She is someone who is technically a princess, but I think that what's really cool about this project, about this character specifically, is that everyone's trying to flip the narrative on what it means to be a princess...Raya is totally a warrior. When she was a kid, she was excited to get her sword. And she grows up to be a really badass, gritty warrior and can really take care of herself."

Okay, what's the problem? How could this be anything less than great? 

Fair question. I agree -- Tran's points about Disney trying to "flip the narrative on what it means to be a princess" is important -- and definitely in line with their recent marketing campaigns for the Princess franchise. And trust me -- I am all for strong, empowered, warrior characters.

My concern is that Disney has a tendency to Otherize its Princesses of Color -- to mark them as different from the typical white, European Princesses in significant ways. As early as 2004, Celeste Lacroix was pointing out that Disney's non-white heroines -- Pocahontas, Esmeralda, and, to some extent, Jasmine. Lacroix's point is that the non-White Princesses are often more sexualized and more associated with nature than the White Princesses, reinforcing the normative superiority of Whites. That is -- non-white Princesses don't get to just be princesses: they don't get to wear floofy ballgowns and have servants.

We can see this trend continue in the films that were released even after Lacroix's publication: Rapunzel, Merida, and Anna & Elsa, while all more active and empowered women, still wear ballgowns and live in castles. While Tiana and Moana may not be hypersexualized, they are definitely associated with Nature (Tiana turns into a frog and spends a good deal of time in the Louisiana bayou, and Moana is chosen by the Ocean to restore the heart of Te Fiti and give new life to a barren lava field) and don't wear ballgowns or live in castles. 

Raya, it seems, would continue this disparity: I'm guessing she won't be wearing a ballgown as a warrior or living in a castle, as Entertainment Weekly also reveals that "Raya (voiced by Tran) is the daughter of the Chief of the Heart Lands, one of the five lands in the fictional kingdom of Kumandra. Years ago, dragons and humans lived in harmony, until monsters known as Druun invaded, forcing the dragons to sacrifice themselves and save humanity. Raya's father was also killed, and the film follows her journey as a warrior to find the last dragon, who she believes can save Kumandra." 

This is where it gets tricky: on the one hand, I'm definitely not advocating that we continue telling solely European fairy tales, and the fact that this is a story deeply rooted in Southeast Asian culture is so very important. I'm also not saying that we should impose cultural inaccuracies as an empty gesture just for the sake of "equality." That is, we shouldn't impose castles and ballgowns and pretty passive princesses on a culture where castles and ballgowns simply don't exist. And I'm also not necessarily advocating for a return to pretty princess stories. 

But I would maybe like to see some blurring of the boundaries: a White warrior Princess in the vein of Mulan and Moana and a Non-White Princess who does live in a castle and maybe doesn't wear ballgowns, but is unabashedly royal. And those Princesses of Color don't necessarily have to represent a real culture: while Pocahontas and Mulan are based on real people/people of legend, and Moana seeks to explain The Long Pause in Polynesian culture, Jasmine's Agrabah is fictional (sort of) as is Naveen's Maldonia. 

Disney can create fictional worlds which can be ruled by characters of any color -- which I think I would like to see a bit more of. Maybe it would raise questions I haven't yet thought of...

The bottom line is that I'm still really excited about this movie, and I'm probably even more excited about Kelly Marie Tran's starring role. After all the hate and vitriol she received from toxic Star Wars fans, she's deserves a bit of pixie dust. 

Sunday, September 16, 2018

Spotted: Target Run & Done

After being cooped up in our house since Wednesday evening -- thanks, Hurricane Florence -- my family and I ventured out to Target this morning. (Honestly, though, where else would we go?) We didn't really need anything, but Target is such a great place to wander around and somehow end up with a cartful of random things.

Plus there's coffee. Which, after four days in the house, was definitely, actually needed. (Starbucks + Target is my second favorite pairing behind Starbucks + Disney.)

Target's also a great place to do "field research," which is a fun way of saying I get to look at the Disney-related merchandise through an academic lens.

And Target didn't disappoint. First up:

📷: Me (and yes, that's my coffee in the background)
First, I tried searching Target for "mulan doll" and the only one that came up was the Hasbro doll. (At least she's wearing the outfit from the end of the movie and not the matchmaker outfit that she's usually in.) This one is marketed as an "Action Adventure Figure" so that's a solid plus. Also a plus -- this is the closest thing to Warrior Mulan I've seen in the Mulan merchandise. Normally, for whatever reason, she's marketed in a dress and definitely conforms to feminine conventions. So, another solid plus for a Mulan figure who's wielding a sword and is portrayed as a kick-ass woman. 
But...those legs!? 

Not exactly a win in the "realistic body image" column there, Hasbro. So, Con

On a less relevant note, I also saw this:

📷: Me
My daughter wanted to watch Tangled this weekend -- anything that wasn't Frozen! -- and I'm just really confused about why Maximus has such a glittery mane. I'm pretty sure he's not glittery in the movie and can't we market a male horse without adding glitter? My daughter loves Maximus just fine without the glittery mane, and I'm pretty sure she doesn't need to have one marketed towards her.

And we may or may not have left the store with this shirt:


Dream big, princess.

Sunday, June 3, 2018

Wreck-It Ralph 2: The Disney Princesses Unite!


A few days ago, this post popped up on my feed:


A couple of important things to note:

(1) Alan Tudyk is back! Given that his original character, King Candy/Turbo, was the villain and (spoiler!) got his just desserts, and also given that Alan Tudyk has become Disney Animation Studios' good-luck charm -- I was worried that he wouldn't be in this film. Worries no more. 
(2) Taraji P. Henson's character looks awesome.
(3) Perhaps, most importantly, our first look at the Disney Princesses all together is here!

Here's a bigger look at the picture:

📷: Purewow via Disney
Again, there are a couple of things to note here:
(1) This is awesome. And you will never get me to say otherwise. I imagine this to be some sort of super-cool Princess secret society. Or, resort/spa where they can relax and get away from princessy-duties.
(2) Excluding Vanellope, there are 11 princesses present:
  • (2a) Interestingly, Anna, Elsa and Moana are all here -- even though they haven't been officially inducted into the princess court.
  • (2b) All the First Wave princesses are present -- Snow White, Cinderella, and Aurora -- even though their voice actors are no longer with us. (I always assumed they'd have different actors, so it'll be fun/interesting to see who they cast.)
    Also--Aurora is in her pink dress. Don't get me started.
  • (2c) 3/5 of the Second Wave princesses are present: Belle, Jasmine, & Pocahontas are there, but Ariel and Mulan aren't. More on this in a second.
  • (2d) 2/3 of the Third Wave princesses are present -- Tiana and Rapunzel, but Merida isn't. (I'm not counting Moana yet.)
Given the panorama-type view of the shot, it's possible that the three of them are just off-screen (and maybe we'll see them in the trailer tomorrow). 

Shockingly, (she said sarcastically), the internet is a little upset about Mulan not being included -- thanks, Buzzfeed!


Which, I know they ask about Ariel in the sub-title, but still. It doesn't take a whole lot of effort to count the princesses and figure out that not *every* Disney princess is there -- I counted 3.  But there's a lot of ignorance misinformation in this post. 



Like that whole jibber-jabber about how Mulan isn't *technically* a princess. Yes. We talk about this a lot in my class -- i.e., how do we determine a Disney princess? Do you have to be born one? Can you marry into royalty? And what about different cultures? After all, princesses are primarily (not exculsively!) a Western concept, especially in the way Disney portrays them. Is Jasmine a princess, as the daughter of a sultan? Is Pocahontas a princess, as the daughter of a chief? (Maui would clear this up.)  But I digress. -- The point is: when Andy Mooney created the princess franchise in the early 2000s, they had to come up with some criteria. After all, Tinker Bell was included at one point -- but then they went and did the whole Fairies franchise ($$$), so she was out. Any female character who is included in the Royal Court, is an official princess, regardless of birth, marriage, or any other factors. See below:

📷: WDWThemeParks
All 11 princesses are there -- and yes, this is before Frozen and Moana, but there hasn't been another "induction" since.

So then they point to these cast photos that were taken at the 2017 D23 Expo (which I thought I blogged about, but I can't find it. Which makes sense. I was so. very. pregnant. in July of 2017 and also running around after a 1-year-old.)


What these images tell us is that, from left to right in the second picture, Paige O'Hara (Belle), Irene Bedard (Pocahontas), Mandy Moore (Rapunzel), Auli'i Cravalho (Moana), Sarah Silverman (Vanellope), Kristen Bell (Anna), Kelly MacDonald (Merida), Anika Noni Rose (Tiana), Linda Larkin (Jasmine) and Jodi Benson (Ariel) are all there. When I first read this story, I assumed Ming-Na Wen (Mulan) wasn't there because of Agents of Shield commitments.

I'm just going to ignore this comment from the Buzzfeed post -- But interestingly the voice actors of Snow White, Cinderella, Elsa, and Aurora were not present, even though they are in the shot from the movie. -- because, you know, LOGIC. (Snow White came out in 1937, guys. It's a safe bet that Adriana Caselotti isn't still alive -- she passed in 1997 -- and even if she were, she'd be pretty old.)

So, yeah. Merida and Ariel will be there -- although no one seemed particularly worried about here in the Buzzfeed post  😢 -- and it's a safe bet that Mulan will be too.

So, let's just enjoy the awesomeness of all the princesses together and hope that we see them all in the trailer tomorrow.

Tuesday, May 29, 2018

Disney Princesses As: Career Women!

May, 2018: We're still re-imagining Disney Princesses in inventive ways. #somethingsneverchange

The latest one imagines Disney Princesses as modern-day career women:

via ScaryMommy
The collection is by Matt Burt and he's put a lot of thought into the careers for each character.

Chronologically, here they are:

Snow White -- Leading Psychologist
Cinderella -- Animal Rights Activist
Aurora -- CEO of Spinning Wheel Coffee 
Ariel -- Pop Star & Record Producer 
Belle -- University Chancellor
Jasmine -- UN Ambassador
Pocahontas -- Environmental Activist (I mean, duh)
Mulan -- Title IX Lawyer
Tiana -- Award Winning Chef (I mean, duh)
Rapunzel -- Neurologist
Merida -- Two Time Olympian (Archery & Equestrian)
Elsa & Anna* -- Climate Change Scientists
Moana -- Officer in the Navy

*Not official princesses, but, a common mistake.

Okay, one, it's clear that Burt put a lot of thought and rationale into each of these career choices.
Two--I love that each of them is an empowering career for the character -- you've got chancellors and ambassadors and scientists. (Yay for Women in STEM!)

But.

I wouldn't be me if I didn't have nit-picky thoughts.

1. Most obvious -- Tiana & Pocahontas: really, any other career options for these two wouldn't work.


2. My favorite "new career" -- Aurora: I love that she's the CEO of a coffee company. Tongue-in-cheek, but oddly appropriate.


3. No...just no -- Snow White as a "Leading Psychologist" and Rapunzel as a "Neurologist": Nope. Not buying it. While I appreciate that Burt made Snow a "leading" psychologist who cares for her clients but also presents at conferences, I...would not put my faith in her as a psychologist. If anything, I think she'd made a great preschool/kindergarten/elementary school teacher. Her cheerful disposition plus her ability to make people actually wash their hands? Textbook.
And Rapunzel? Yeah, cool. Neurologist, doctor, med school, blah blah blah. But the thing I love about the end of Tangled is that Flynn tells us that she learned to rule and govern her people and was a great princess/queen. So, yeah. I would have liked to see her be a senator or even a female president. 

    

4. Miscellaneous thoughts, from someone who has clearly spent too much time thinking about this:
  • I guess I see Cinderella as an Animal Rights Activist -- but maybe she and Ariel join forces together. I don't love Ariel as a Pop Star -- because she's my favorite, and it seems a shallow career -- but...I suppose Ariel is kind of shallow, so it fits. :/ 
  • Again, I love that Belle is the chancellor of a university, but again, it kinda doesn't fit her personality. I don't see her as an authoritative decision-maker -- something I think Once Upon A Time captures nicely with Belle as a librarian -- maybe an English professor at best. 
  • Mulan & Moana -- For some reason, I'm just "meh" about these. I think it's because they seem too rebellious for such straight-laced careers. I'm pretty sure Mulan would do something -- with the best of intentions, of course -- that would end up getting her disbarred. And Moana? She relies too much on emotion and instinct to be a good naval officer -- I can't see her taking orders well. 
Like I said, I've clearly spent too much time thinking about this! 




Friday, May 4, 2018

I Cannot Even With This Mulan Mess RN

A few weeks ago, I went to the outlet malls with my mom. [This was before Toys R Us announced they were closing all of their stores. Legit closing -- not like those "Going Out FOR Business" sales you see at all those stores in the beach.] We popped into the Toys R Us outlet to look for Easter basket gifts and, of course, we ended up in the Disney section. 

Where I stumbled upon this:


Like...I don't even know what to do with this.

  1. How old are they supposed to be? I get the Animator Dolls series -- especially when there's an actual younger version of the character in the film. But these? They look younger -- not like their counterparts in the film -- but at the same time, they still look adult? It's weird.
  2. They don't even look like themselves -- Mulan looks like a weird version of that Dolls of the World Thai Barbie doll. And IDK what's going on with Shang. 
  3. Don't even get me started on that slogan: "Princess Mulan brings great honor to her family." PRINCESS Mulan? I know she's part of the Disney Princess brand/franchise, but I've never heard her referred to as Princess Mulan. And where did her crown come from?!?
    And how exactly is she bringing great honor to her family? Not as a warrior, in that outfit. That pink thing, coupled with the fact that she's paired with Shang, would seem to imply that, after everything that happens in the movie, the way she brings honor to her family is through her marriage. 
You know I normally support/defend you Disney, but your merchandising people missed the mark on this one. 


Monday, April 30, 2018

Let's Talk About This Live-Action Mulan

*sigh*

Here we go again.

A few weeks ago, I read about the casting news for the new live-action adaptation of Mulan:


via Variety

At first, I was just excited to discuss the news with my students -- for three reasons:

  1. Jet Li is being cast as the Emperor -- given Li's martial arts & action movie background, it seems an interesting choice for the Emperor (who is a very zen character in the animated film). I could be biased though -- Pat Morita is the Emperor for me -- I imagine this is how some Harry Potter fans felt when Richard Harris died and Michael Gambon replaced him as Dumbledore. 
  2. Gong Li is "the villain as a powerful witch" -- WHOA. This is what I was most excited to talk about -- there's no witch in the animated film and the implications of this are fascinating. Not only are we seemingly getting rid of the Huns/Shan Yu, but we're adding in a female villain. And not only a female villain -- a witch. More female-female conflict? And what are the ramifications for the empowerment storyline? (i.e., the fact that Mulan was so awesome because she beat all the boys and proved she was just as good -- if not better -- than them.)
  3. Fun tidbit: Mulan gets a sister.
    Interesting on several levels because (1) Mulan was one of the only Disney Princess films to show an intact nuclear family -- Dad + Mom + Mulan + Grandma. Up to this point, only Aurora had both her parents alive -- but I don't really count that since her mother is so underdeveloped it's painful and has maybe one line of dialogue in the entire film. So, yes, while Mulan's relationship with her father is still the central relationship of the film (like all of the other 2nd wave princess films) and while her mother is a relatively flat character, it's still important.
    And (2) Mulan doesn't have any other siblings in the animated film -- least of all male siblings who could have ostensibly taken her father's place instead of the daughter. But more importantly, Disney Princesses don't usually get female friends or siblings. Sure, Ariel has her sisters, but she's the "different one" (with her red hair and her mismatched shells and tail) and doesn't seem particularly close with any of them. Sure, Pocahontas has Nakoma -- but that friendship has disastrous results. It's not until we get to Tiana that we have a princess with a "good" friend -- and whatever you say about Lottie, she is a good friend -- and it's not until Elsa and Anna that we see a developed sisterly relationship with depth. So while we don't know anything about their relationship, it's at least another step in the right direction.
    Although, as some of my Chinese students pointed out, Mulan does have siblings in the original ballad. 
But the discussion turned into something more than I could have hoped for. My students had questions -- really good questions. They wanted to know more about who was playing Mulan, about this witch, about Shang, and about the release date. 

Which led me to this Elle article: "Everything We Know About Disney's Live-Action Mulan" -- where we zeroed in on this:


Wait--there's a character replacing Shang? As in, THERE WILL BE NO LI SHANG IN THIS MOVIE?!




Obviously, this was worth investigating. So, we clicked the link, which led us to this Tweet:


Let's break this down. First up, this not-Shang Chen guy:


"Full of himself, with a mean, bullying streak to him" -- we quickly drew parallels to Gaston (possibly because we'd just watched that live-action film for discussion), which does not bode well, given the type of toxic masculinity Gaston represents.

While we were also confused by the phrase "something like love" (what does that even mean?!?!), the more problematic part is the part where "after learning that his rival is a woman, his intense feelings of rivalry turn into something very different." On the one hand, it seems as if this is Disney's answer to any sort of queer subtext that might have existed in the animated film -- Shang may or may not have had some sort of attraction to Ping, which made him sort of a bisexual icon. (People were not happy.) And, on the other hand, all of this smacks of that silly thing parents used to say "if a boy is mean to you, it means he likes you." I don't know -- I find it extremely problematic that when Honghui thinks Mulan is a boy, he's a rival who he can/should bully; but as soon as he finds out Mulan is a girl, BAM! He's in love.

But in case you thought that was the worst, it gets better:

So, on the positive side, one of my students pointed out that while the casting call for Chen Honghui mentions his attraction to her, at least there's no mention of Mulan's romantic feelings for the men in her life, so...silver lining?

But here are the interesting things:
  • The Huns are out. (Which means, at the very least, that if this isn't a musical, we'll have to change the iconic line, "Let's get down to business / to defeat the Huns.") I have no idea who the Gokturks are, and the Wikipedia entry isn't super helpful.
  • My students focused on the "strapping down her breasts" line as an odd thing to mention specifically. I mean, yes, one would assume that dressing as a man who necessitate that, but it's an odd thing to mention in a casting call. Unless they were specifically looking for a busty, female female -- as in, one who was clearly female. 
  • But the most interesting -- and potentially problematic -- part is this: "There is a mysterious power inside Mulan.

  • At first, I thought it was just the dramatic language of a casting call (you know, like "something like love"). But the more we talked about it -- and especially in conjunction with the revelation of the addition of a WITCH -- the more it seemed plausible that this "mysterious power" could actually be supernatural in nature. 
Just to be clear:

Apparently, this news -- the casting calls -- aren't really news, as this article from March of 2017 makes clear. Donya Abramo also makes clear the significance of this information, in a very eloquent way:


I don't remember this information going viral a year ago, but with the explicit addition of a supernatural character, the theory is gaining traction. As is the outrage that the fundamental message of the story could potentially be changed. As Abramo points out, "The beauty of Mulan is in the indisputable truth that what she achieves is down to her own skill and stubborn determination — both mental and physical." In other words, Mulan was a revolutionary character not only for her representation -- don't delve too deeply into Disney's past representation of Asian characters; it isn't pretty -- but for her deviation from past Disney princesses. She wasn't passive or focused on romance -- she was every bit as strong, resilient, intelligent as the boys, and, in the end, was the one to save China and the Emperor. Her story -- however much it deviated from the original Chinese ballad -- was empowering and inspiring. 

But if you give her powers? If you make her supernatural? I suppose it doesn't necessarily take away from her individual uniqueness, but it turns the story into another Chosen One narrative. She becomes another Harry Potter, specially chosen to defeat the supernatural evil. 

Yes, at this point, most of this is just speculation, since we're going on rumors and casting calls, not concrete facts. And, yes. Scripts undergo rewrites and films undergo reshoots, so it's all fluid and up-in-the-air right now. 

But still.

The rumors paint a very troubling picture -- not in the least because, up to this point, Disney's live action adaptations have been extremely faithful to their source material. Some critics question why even remake the film if you're just going to essentially remake the movie, but with actors not animation. Which begs the question -- why start deviating now? In the case of a film like Dumbo, the answer is kind of obvious: there's not a terrible amount of substance to the original, so, yeah. You're going to have to create a story there. 

But that's not the case with Mulan

Maybe they were trying to be more faithful to the original source material? Or, as Yohana Desta points out in her Vanity Fair piece, "casting a Chinese star helps the studio cater directly to Chinese audiences, the all-important demographic that can bolster or destroy blockbuster's global box-office hopes." But, as my Chinese students angrily and frustratedly pointed out, there's no magic in the original ballad -- and, to them, changing the story so significantly was not likely to curry favor with them. 

So, I guess we'll wait and see. But I do not have high hopes. 

Monday, September 25, 2017

Disney Princesses As...Living in 2017

I haven't done a "Disney Princesses As" post in a while, so it was nice to stumble across these images: according to BoredPanda, the artist is Chilean digital artist Fernanda Suarez, and his current project is to imagine what Disney Princesses would look like if they were living in 2017. Check out his Instagram here.

Setting aside the fact that he is ridiculously talented in a way that I could never even dream of aspiring to, his vision is interesting...most of them look edgier to me, maybe even a little sinister?

For one thing, Jasmine and Pocahontas don't actually look that different, IMHO:


Is there a commentary on exorcized beauty here? Several critics have pointed out that the non-white princesses are more sexualized than their white counterparts, so maybe it's not surprising? (Although, I don't know what it says about 2017 that being "modern" is "sultry"...although maybe it's just the discrepancy from the softer, more innocent animated versions?)

Snow White and Cinderella kinda have this whole zombie/supernatural/paranormal vibe going on...I think it's the eyes. They both have this sultry, come hither vibe, but the coloring gives them that supernatural edge. Plus, nothing says temptation like an apple.

I think Mulan is my favorite though. Maybe it's because she looks so different from the traditional animated version, and maybe because Suarez didn't seem to make her hyper-feminine and fit her into a "delicate" princess mold.


Monday, September 18, 2017

Disney Princesses Singing In Their "Native" Language

This fun video popped up in my Facebook feed tonight:


I don't think it's *entirely* accurate to say that they're singing in their "native languages" -- at least not all of them. Mulan for sure, because the film is clearly set in ancient China, even if it's not historically accurate; Meg in Hercules is pretty accurate as well, since the film explicitly mentions the Greek gods; and there are a few super subtle references to Germany in Snow White (namely the beer steins in dwarves' cottage). But Sleeping Beauty, The Little Mermaid and Frozen -- they're all set in kingdoms once upon a time in a faraway land. Sure, the original "Sleeping Beauty" is of French origin; and Hans Christian Andersen was Danish, but that doesn't mean The Little Mermaid is set in Denmark; and Arendelle is a fictional country inspired by Norway. I'm not even going to touch on the Aladdin one, because that's a hot mess that I've discussed before. 

But a fun video nevertheless. :) 

Thursday, September 14, 2017

"Let's Get Down To Business"

Came across this the other day: 



A lot of people in the comments are all, "This never happened!" to which I say...meh. Who cares if it did or didn't? It's still funny.

And, FWIW, I believe it could have happened. Every class, I resist the urge to start class by saying "Let's get down to business..." Once, a few years ago, I said it by accident -- the class (which was a fantastic one, BTW) was being super chatty before class and I needed to get them to focus -- and one girl chimed in, "...to defeat the Huns." Which set off a little bit of a chain reaction and a detour to watch the music video. Because if you can't randomly pull up a Disney song on YouTube and have an impromptu sing-a-long in Decoding Disney, when can you?

Friday, September 30, 2016

Disney Princesses As....Hogwarts Students

This week in "Disney Princesses As...": they're Hogwarts students! Or, at the very least, they've been sorted into Hogwarts Houses.

While this warms my nerdy heart, it isn't exactly something new....Disney Princess Reimaginer Extraordinaire Isaiah Stevens has done it, and so has a Deviant Artist named Annabella (hers might be my favorite).

My point is: it's been done before, so why do it again unless you disagree with the Sorting Results? And there are definitely some different results here.

Some of them make total sense (a.k.a. I totally agree with them). Like, for instance:

PC: Disney via HelloGiggles

This makes total sense: Snow White and Cinderella with their unrelenting optimism and kindness? Total Hufflepuff. And they are clearly unafraid of toil (as all good Hufflepuffs are) because they not only clean for the baddies in their lives, but they do it with a smile and a song.

Also making total sense?

PC: Disney via HelloGiggles
Yah. Mulan and Merida are both clearly Gryffindors. I mean...the name of Merida's movie is Brave, so I totally get that one.

Also one I like, but hadn't really thought of before:

PC: Disney via HelloGiggles
Ariel is totally the Luna Lovegood of Disney Princesses. And, she's my favorite princess, so it makes sense I'd love that she's sorted into my house.

Speaking of my favorites....
PC: Disney via HelloGiggles

I'm sorry. Elsa is NOT a Slytherin. No. Just no. She is 100% a Ravenclaw. I'm not sure how being "grounded in reality" disqualifies you from being a Ravenclaw -- not all Ravenclaws are like Luna. (Cho Chang was a Ravenclaw, after all. Not that that really helps my case.) The thing that bugs me here is that Elsa is NOT ambitious -- a very Slytherin quality, and not necessarily in a negative way. But "an ambitious leader" wouldn't retreat from a position to power to a place of solitude as Elsa does: a Slytherin would not go build and rule an ice power in isolation. A Slytherin would most definitely stay and rule, regardless of how people thought of him/her. 

Hans, for example, is absolutely a Slytherin -- but he's not a princess. Which I think is the flaw here: Disney princesses are all inherently good; not too many of them are going to belong in Slytherin, even if you read the Slytherin qualities positively. There's going to be a lot of Hufflepuff (First Wave) and a lot of Gryffindor. 

But, if you just look at the princesses, somebody's got to be in Slytherin. Which is why this happens:

PC: Disney via HelloGiggles

Again, I say: NO. JUST NO. I get the ambition part -- which is why I see Slytherin, but Tiana ultimately gives up her dream of a restaurant when Facilier offers it to her: she chooses love/Naveen over the restaurant, which again, I'm not sure a Slytherin would do. (Hence why she's a Disney princess.) But more than that -- Tiana's defined by her work ethic -- she is as unafraid of toil as Snow White and Cinderella are, probably even more so. (I've argued that Tiana is basically an updated version of Cinderella; very similar rags-to-riches story, just with more modern complexity.) The Sorting Hat tells us that "Those patient Hufflepuffs are true / And unafraid of toil." Yeah. Tiana saved for her restaurant penny by penny for years: that is textbook Hufflepuff, right there.

I know I take this all way too seriously, but Disney and Harry Potter are two of my favorite things so I love when they collide. 

Monday, August 29, 2016

Happy First Day of Classes!

In honor of The First Day of Fall Classes At Duke, a story of an epic school ID photo:


This girl is my hero -- and she'll bring honor to us all. :)

Read the full story here at Buzzfeed.

Tuesday, March 8, 2016

Happy International Women's Day!

The Disney Princess FB page had four princesses -- Belle, Jasmine, Mulan and Rapunzel -- but Mulan seemed the most appropriate choice. While her feminism is a source of debate for many academics, I feel like, in terms of "women's economic, political and social achievements," she's the best Disney Princess--closely followed by Tiana. 


I'll freely admit: I didn't really know today was "International Women's Day" until I saw all the social media posts...and even then, I didn't fully know what it was. I mean...I get the basic context from the name, but still.

So, according to the Wikipedia page (and since this isn't an academic piece, citing Wikipedia is totally okay):
"In different regions the focus of the celebrations ranges from general celebration of respect, appreciation, and love towards women for women's economic, political, and social achievements. Started as a Socialist political event, the holiday blended the culture of many countries, primarily in Europe, especially those in the Soviet Bloc.[3] In some regions, the day lost its political flavor, and became simply an occasion for people to express their love for women in a way somewhat similar to a mixture of Mother's Day and Valentine's Day. In other regions, however, the political and human rights theme designated by the United Nations runs strong, and political and social awareness of the struggles of women worldwide are brought out and examined in a hopeful manner. Some people celebrate the day by wearing purple ribbons."
Huh. Interesting.

Friday, September 11, 2015

Well played, Tee Turtle. Well played.

So TeeTurtle finally released the other two designs in their Disney/Harry Potter mash-up series -- Rapunzel as Hufflepuff and Maleficent as Slytherin. 


I love them all -- but since I was officially sorted into Ravenclaw (as if there was every any doubt, Pottermore!), I bought the Belle one. 

I gotta say though -- two of these are absolutely spot-on. Maleficent as Slytherin (even though she's not a princess -- is there a princess who would be a Slytherin? Maybe Jasmine...) and Belle as Ravenclaw are perfect. 

And I see/totally get Mulan as a Gryffindor and Rapunzel as a Hufflepuff -- but I would have gone with different choices....as my husband pointed out, I feel like they really missed an opportunity to have Merida as a Gryffindor. I mean, her movie was literally called Brave. And while Rapunzel is 100% a Hufflepuff, I would have gone with either Snow White or Tiana; after all, "those patient Hufflepuffs are true and unafraid of toil." 

I'm sure it's been a very popular series--I'm just sayin' they could do a second series. :P There's tons of inspiration by DeviantArtist Eira1893 -- one of my favorite Buzzfeed Geeky posts